Influence of Emu Oil on
Skin Thickness
In Older Individuals
By: Dr. Leigh
Hopkins
From presentation given at AOCS Ratite Oil session,
May 1998, Chicago Illinois
As we age, there are a number of issues that
set us up for complications in our daily lives. There is a change in our skin thickness,
so we are always interested in that and looking to change some of
that. There is loss of elasticity
and of the adherence to deep tissue – some of that sagging that you get is
due to this. Langerhans cells are
also decreased, and so immunocompetence is declining with age, and we are
more prone to skin infections. There
is also probably a decline in that ability of the skin to synthesize
lipids, so this is the principal benefit we are aiming for when we apply
oils. Skin dryness also increases
with age.
The consequence is that there is a loss
of the integrity of the skin, and then a decline in the ability to repair
this. You are also at a greater risk
for insults to the skin/body.
Dr. Hollick has done some studies with
mice, applying emu oil to their skin with corn oil as the negative
control. Epidermal growth thickness
and, believe it of not, hair growth increased. His comments were that there was
increased thickness although I don’t know what that number was, and 80% of
resting hair follicles were “charged”.
The bottom line is, you have to have a hair follicle for it to be
rejuvenated. Emu oil will not make
hair follicles.
Dr. Pugliese, last year, did another
study on skin thickness using ratite oils (ostrich, rhea, and emu), with
retinoic acid (Retin-A) as the positive control and mineral oil as the
negative control. There were probably
4-5 mice per group. The findings from
that mouse study was that the Retin-A gave marked hyperplasia. The ratite oils gave anything from mild
hyperplasia to the mosaic effect seen with Retin-A. The mineral oil, to out chagrin perhaps,
also gave a postive response. But
this is because it is an irritant, and it gives a different hyperplasia to
the response you see with Retin-A.
We also looked at fish oil and chicken oil. These did not demonstrate any topical
activity.
The next study that Dr. Pugliese did for
us was to take a look at elderly individuals and see what their response
was to the topical application of emu oil.
So we recruited 8 people. In
retrospect, there is a little problem here since they were unbelievably
healthy Mennonites. These people,
then, were a little unusual. The
average age was 72. We did throw in
one unusual patient who was 38, who had scleroderma, so she lowered the
average age. The average age would
have been 77 otherwise, and there were 4 patients that were over 80, or at
least claimed to be. I didn’t check
birth certificates or anything, but these church Mennonites cannot lie, so
we had to accept this. They were
instructed to apply emu oil at least nightly (but more often if they wanted
to) to the back of the non-dominant hand.
That is what we measured to skin thickness on. The study was 6 weeks in duration.
Most of the mice studies had been of
about a 5-day duration. I was always
a little concerned about what you can do to the skin of a newborn in just 5
days, and how applicable that would be to humans. I think you would probably need a longer
time frame.
This (SLIDE SHOWN) is sort of a summary
of the 8 patients, looking at the summation of the epidermis and papillary
dermis changes. There is a huge
variation in skin thickness between individuals, so if I just gave you the
raw numbers, it becomes a little tricky.
That’s why you need to look at the relative change. (percent
change). Let me point two out. Patient 6 is the young lady in the group
who had the scleroderma. There was
essentially no response. I was
looking for a miracle cure for scleroderma, and this study suggests that
it’s not emu oil. And this other
individual with zero change was an individual who claimed he was 84. He was what you would call “ham
hands.” They were so big he could
not purchase gloves. I think he
plowed with his hands. They were the
hardest hands I’ve ever seen, and when you put emu oil on them it would
just dissipate right away. So I
thought this could be interesting.
But maybe he needed quarts of emu oil, instead of the two ounces
that we gave. He had no change. So there are limits, and he could have
been an individual that did not follow the protocol as closely as the
others. Anyway, his hands were
different.
The changes are of the order of 9.9 to
10.6%, depending on which portion of the skin you looked at. Combined, there was an 8% increase in
skin thickness from 6 weeks of application of pure emu oil.
Most of the other products that I’ll be
talking to you about in later sessions are formulation, looking to make
enhancements. If you haven’t tried
emu oil, it’s of course grease. It
depends on how interested you are in applying grease anywhere – to your
hair, to your hands, etc.
Formulations that take some of that greasiness with probably be
important to us.
I will elaborate more later about the
fatty acid roles. The fatty acids
are probably what contribute more to the changes. I’ll give more details in the next talk.
Here are some slides to show you what the
scans look like (SLIDES SHOWN). This
section right up here is the epidermis, and this software program within
the equipment allows you to determine the thickness changes. This area in here is the papillary
dermis. You can look at density, and
there are a number of different measures that you can follow with this type
of equipment, all depending on the internal software for those
interpretations.
(end of skin thickness part of talk)
FOOTNOTE:
In response to the question of whether skin thickness change was
measured at the beginning and at the end of the study, or between the two
hands (one with emu oil applied, the other without), Dr. Hopkins said that
only skin thickness of the emu-oil-treated hand was measured – first at the
beginning of the study, then at the end.
|
